Under the Skin is a strange film to witness. While all of it
can be interpreted literally, much of it is at least initially mystifying. Its
stripped-down narrative, low on dialogue, is definitely reminiscent of the
stereotype of an art film, though that’s no accident: Under the Skin certainly
qualifies as highbrow.
Scarlet Johansson stars as a nameless alien who has taken a
female form in order to seduce men on the streets of Scotland. What motivates
her? It’s unrevealed. A lot is unrevealed in this film, which revels in leaving
blanks for imagination and interpretation to fill in. While much of it is a
science fiction horror film, this genre fiction moniker is merely a disguise.
In practice, while the combination of the haunting images and Johansson’s unsettling
performance certainly fit the horror mold, the film has more avant-garde
ambitions.
Under the Skin holds the loose narrative of this alien
exploring Scotland, but a large amount of the film is based on singular events,
connected just as much thematically as narratively. You see, Under the Skin is
a sort of parable. At first, it seems like a sort of monster movie, and while
soon the simple style of the movie gives the impression that it has some
purpose beyond that, this purpose is obtuse and required me to search for other
reviews and articles to understand it. The purpose of many scenes is initially
unclear, and for some viewers the narrative may prove confusing.
However, in retrospect, it can be seen how the film
communicates its themes. All scenes can be interpreted literally, but each one
has a purpose and may even have metaphorical value. This film’s identity as a
parable is still lost on me, but even then, the literal interpretations of
these scenes still hold plenty of meaning. Aside from this, the direction is
oftentimes haunting. Visuals are sometimes macabre, and the film is frequently
disturbing. This alien is consistently otherworldly, and that she’s so shrouded
in mystery is used to make us more afraid of her.
Under the Skin is notable for some very striking sci-fi
imagery. For example, the introductory scene has both what appears to be a
cosmic event, as well as what appears to be an eye. However, later on, the
visuals are often made murky by the heavy use of shadows, making shots
occasionally border on indecipherable. Finally, the soundtrack makes heavy use
of drones. This is very appropriate for this film, but taken on its own it can
get grating.
No comments:
Post a Comment